Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:56:01 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Marvell/SysKonnect Yukon II Gigabit Ethernet testers. Message-ID: <457DF011.9010701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061129013052.GC71523@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060926002916.GA5975@cdnetworks.co.kr> <ekikdg$aqu$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061129013052.GC71523@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
I successfully tested this driver under 7-CURRENT as of today on an ASUS
Vintage AH-1 based system.
lspci has the following to say about it:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 PCI-E
Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 19)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Marvell 88E8053 Gigabit
Ethernet controller PCIe (Asus)
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18
Memory at fe4fc000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
I/O ports at c800
Expansion ROM at fe4c0000 [disabled]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
Capabilities: [5c] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+
Queue=0/1 Enable-
Capabilities: [e0] Express Legacy Endpoint IRQ 0
A few sample netperf runs between this system (AMD Athlon64 3000+) and
an Intel Dothan 1.8Ghz based Lenovo T43 with bge(4) interconnected via a
3Com 5-port gigabit workgroup switch reveal the following.
anglepoise# netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 192.168.123.18
UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
192.168.123.18 (192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
9216 9216 10.00 129443 1135712 954.30
42080 10.00 128739 949.11
anglepoise# netperf -t UDP_RR -H 192.168.123.18
UDP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
192.168.123.18 (192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
9216 42080 1 1 10.00 2804.30
9216 42080
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H 192.168.123.18
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.123.18
(192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
65536 32768 32768 10.00 642.80
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.123.18
TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
192.168.123.18 (192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
32768 65536 1 1 10.00 2790.69
32768 65536
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_CRR -H 192.168.123.18
TCP Connect/Request/Response TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET
to 192.168.123.18 (192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Local /Remote
Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans.
Send Recv Size Size Time Rate
bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec
32768 65536 1 1 10.00 1350.91
32768 65536
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_MAERTS -H 192.168.123.18
TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.123.18
(192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
65536 32768 32768 10.00 407.51
And a statistically tighter test:
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_STREAM -I 99 -i 30,10 -H 192.168.123.18
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.123.18
(192.168.123.18) port 0 AF_INET : +/-49.5% @ 99% conf.
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
65536 32768 32768 10.00 644.98
Another test, this time between the same box and a dual PIII 933Mhz
running 6.1-RELEASE with an em(4) card and 66Mhz 64-bit PCI data path on
the same workgroup switch:
anglepoise# netperf -t TCP_STREAM -I 99 -i 30,10 -H 192.168.123.6
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.123.6
(192.168.123.6) port 0 AF_INET : +/-49.5% @ 99% conf.
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
262144 32768 32768 10.00 161.17
...probably harder on the old machine than anything, it is very unlikely
it could saturate at line rate.
Thank you for all the excellent work on this driver, I hope this data is
useful.
regards,
BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?457DF011.9010701>