Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 12:47:47 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency Message-ID: <4617F563.40502@root.org> In-Reply-To: <86ps6g5759.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <460AE39B.4070706@root.org> <86odmcqylx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200703291905.00192.pieter@degoeje.nl> <86k5wzq4vx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <86fy7nq4q1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4617D2CE.1050502@root.org> <86ps6g5759.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: >> Obviously, it's easier to do nothing than something. So here are some >> options: >> >> 1. Add my patch -- if a server returns an error, I see no way it would >> have changed the PWD. If you say "CD GARBAGE", what reasonable system >> would return an error and change to some random dir? >> >> 2. Add an env variable (similar to FTP_PASSIVE_MODE, say >> "FTP_SINGLE_CWD") which forces the current behavior. If not set, fetch >> tries the multi-method first, falls back to the single-method on error. > > No. > > Thanks, > > DES I forgot: 3. #ifdef (on or off by default) Also, can I hear from anyone else besides Mr. No? Thanks, -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4617F563.40502>