Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 16:58:39 +0200 From: Fredrik Lindberg <fli@shapeshifter.se> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@gmail.com> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 119527 for review Message-ID: <4641E19F.80809@shapeshifter.se> In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730705090710h653dc15bjb7a1159484c1c48b@mail.gmail.com> References: <200705082229.l48MTrbh069129@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070509070626.GA41419@freebsd.org> <4641818B.4030507@FreeBSD.org> <20070509103404.D71759@fledge.watson.org> <464199D9.7020908@shapeshifter.se> <9bbcef730705090710h653dc15bjb7a1159484c1c48b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 09/05/07, Fredrik Lindberg <fli@shapeshifter.se> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll take a look at the various queue.h shipped with the major BSDs,
>> and see if I can find a common subset that suits my needs (without too
>> many compromises) and based on the findings I'll reconsider my choice.
>
> I use sys/queue.h in my userland applications all the time, there's no
> problem there.
>
And it works on {Net,Open}BSD?, I could swear that I've been bitten by
sys/queue.h in the past when moving stuff between FreeBSD and NetBSD.
Could have been those TAILQ-macros Robert Watson talked about though.
Fredrik Lindberg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4641E19F.80809>