Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 22:09:38 -0400 From: Sean Bryant <sean@cyberwang.net> To: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More questions about BDB Message-ID: <4650FF62.1060000@cyberwang.net> In-Reply-To: <4650D8F1.3060701@u.washington.edu> References: <4650D8F1.3060701@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Cooper wrote: > Ok, I've run into a strange issue with BDB's hash tables. > > Does anyone know what the following means? > > db_dump185: seq: Invalid argument > > Backstory: > When dumping out a large amount of data it appears that there's an > expected directive which isn't being inserted by Ruby's BDB1.85 > facility into the database, or the directive is inappropriately > expected by the dumping tool that I'm using (possible byte precision > overlap, incorrect coding/heuristics somewhere). > > The only thing I can find regarding the directive under the > /usr/src/lib/libc/db/hash directory is something in hash.c and ndbm.c, > where it looks like seq according to ndbm.c links together two (or > more) sets of data, because of a data length issue and integer sizes, > I think. > > Thanks, > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Just a personal curiosity. Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD is holding on to BDB 1.85?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4650FF62.1060000>