Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:03:06 +0100
From:      Bruce M Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multicast problems [PATCH]
Message-ID:  <4678529A.3080308@incunabulum.net>
In-Reply-To: <4676D168.3050502@incunabulum.net>
References:  <E1I0E3b-0000kk-Ky@clue.co.za>	<46765CB9.9020105@incunabulum.net>	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0706180833080.23884@sea.ntplx.net>	<4676C30E.7040300@incunabulum.net>	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0706181344060.24865@sea.ntplx.net>	<4676C952.5000607@incunabulum.net> <4676D168.3050502@incunabulum.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>
> Here is a patch which explicitly looks for an interface supporting 
> multicast, if no default route exists. The KASSERT should only be 
> triggered if the routing trie code is broken; it is still possible for 
> the last-resort interface lookup to fail if no loopback interface 
> exists, if none of the interfaces have IPv4 addresses, or if no 
> interfaces in the system support multicast.

If this patch solves your problems without resorting to adding a 224/4 
route then I shall commit it to -CURRENT. It is not relevant to 
RELENG_6. Please let me know...

regards,
BMS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4678529A.3080308>