Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:04:20 +0300 From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "tcpflags 0x18<PUSH,ACK>; tcp_do_segment" kernel messages Message-ID: <46C55684.4050402@moneybookers.com> In-Reply-To: <20070816080516.GW988@void.codelabs.ru> References: <20070806224112.GA21876@muon.bluestop.org> <20070807073920.GV50228@void.codelabs.ru> <46C18B60.8050400@moneybookers.com> <20070814145759.GB25169@void.codelabs.ru> <20070814193150.GA21553@rot26.obsecurity.org> <46C30FA6.7060108@moneybookers.com> <20070815145640.GQ988@void.codelabs.ru> <46C319DD.3010806@moneybookers.com> <20070815172731.GR988@void.codelabs.ru> <46C3FEBC.80409@moneybookers.com> <20070816080516.GW988@void.codelabs.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Stefan, good day. > > Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:37:32AM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > >>> To clarify a bit: are all two servers running -CURRENT, or just the >>> client one? >>> >>> >> Only mb7 is -current (i386), mb4 is 6.2 (i386). >> > > OK, fine. > > >> The server is postfix, but the client is binary and we do not have the sources. >> > > But 'strings <client-binary> | grep -i quit' gives us both 'quit' > and 'QUIT'? Just to be sure that it is the client who has these > two SMTP answers inside. > > >> I'll see what the creators can tell about this. >> > > OK, will wait for the information. > > Thank you! > Their response is that the mail server timeout. Now the question is why the program things that the server timeouts when it does not :) -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46C55684.4050402>