Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:49:01 +0100
From:      "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [csjp@FreeBSD.org: Re: rtfree: 0xffffff00036fb1e0 has 1 refs]
Message-ID:  <46D48A3D.6080901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070828165333.GA14159@sub.vaned.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

Christian S.J. Peron wrote:
> I am not sure who has their hands in the routing code these days so
> I figured I would just forward this message off here.  Does the
> following look reasonable?
>   
I'm looking, but mostly with long range goggles on.

Yes, this looks like the right change. rtalloc1() always returns an 
rtentry with the mutex for that rtentry held.

regards
BMS
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46D48A3D.6080901>