Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:20:41 -0400 From: Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_?=, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gbde and geli on 6.2 Message-ID: <46FADB39.6000704@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0709261509g414e3163mff45f9da3bc4d7f3@mail.gmail.com> References: <3aaaa3a0709261509g414e3163mff45f9da3bc4d7f3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Chris wrote:
> Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in
> freebsd releases that are marked stable.
>
> It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the
> lba boundary around lba48.
Could you please test the attached patch to /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c ?
I believe this may be due to the error in the underlying ata driver
rather than specifically to do with encryption.
As a side note - Soren, could we get this commited to both -current and
-stable if there aren't any significant objections?
Michael
[-- Attachment #2 --]
*** ata-all.c~ Thu Aug 30 17:23:15 2007
--- ata-all.c Thu Aug 30 17:23:15 2007
***************
*** 743,749 ****
atadev->flags &= ~ATA_D_48BIT_ACTIVE;
! if ((request->u.ata.lba >= ATA_MAX_28BIT_LBA ||
request->u.ata.count > 256) &&
atadev->param.support.command2 & ATA_SUPPORT_ADDRESS48) {
--- 743,749 ----
atadev->flags &= ~ATA_D_48BIT_ACTIVE;
! if (((request->u.ata.lba + request->u.ata.count) >= ATA_MAX_28BIT_LBA ||
request->u.ata.count > 256) &&
atadev->param.support.command2 & ATA_SUPPORT_ADDRESS48) {
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46FADB39.6000704>