Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:11:40 +0000 From: Vince <jhary@unsane.co.uk> To: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is this for OO-2 for FBSD? Message-ID: <4727035C.5040408@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org> References: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Kline wrote: > I'm in the middle of upgrading some platforms and just caught > OOo_OOG680_m6_source.tar.bz2 (278MB) being downloaded. The port > says that this is OO-2.3, but the build says Ishould have > 11GB of disk and ~2GB of memory. > > I somehow downloaded OO_2.3 as a package on one platform. Does > this make any sense? How many of us have 2 gigs of memory? > Seems more than a biit irrational to me. Or did my > portupgrade -aP grab the wrong port? > I think the problem is that the build does take so long and so much resources that the package updates are a bit scarce. The latest I can see on the mirrors is openoffice.org-2.3.20070910.tbz which doesnt seem to fit the numbering scheme for the openoffice.org-2 port but does fit openoffice.org-2-RC which seems a bit odd. I would probably just get the latest package from the openoffice package site (ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6) and upgrade manually. As a 7.0 user I had to build my own which took a while. Vince > gary >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4727035C.5040408>