Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com> To: John <nesredep@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper Message-ID: <4734DA4C.90702@riderway.com> In-Reply-To: <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com> References: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com> <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > John wrote: >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do >> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the >> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. >> >> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >> >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I >> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? >> >> Is that easier? More likely to work? > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html ----> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean There is now: cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ; make install clean which you should use instead -- its newer :) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4734DA4C.90702>