Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com> To: John <nesredep@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper Message-ID: <4734DA4C.90702@riderway.com> In-Reply-To: <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com> References: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com> <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > John wrote: >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do >> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the >> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. >> >> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >> >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I >> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? >> >> Is that easier? More likely to work? > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html ----> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean There is now: cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ; make install clean which you should use instead -- its newer :) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4734DA4C.90702>