Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:47:02 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! Message-ID: <476072F6.1080406@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20071212232338.1FBF45B99@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <20071212232338.1FBF45B99@mail.bitblocks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bakul Shah wrote: >> I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. > .... >> setuniverse 1 netstat -rn >> [shows table 1] >> setuniverse 2 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.2.1 >> setuinverse 1 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.3.1 >> setuniverse 2 route -n get 10.0.0.3 >> [shows 192.168.2.1] >> setuniverse 1 route -n get 10.0.0.3 >> [shows 192.168.3.1] >> setuniverse 2 start_apache >> [appache starts, always using 192.168.2.1 to reach the 10.0.0 net. >> >> >> also the syscall is setuniverse() >> >> so, you see I really need a better name.... >> setrtab? >> >> rtab? rtbl? >> >> and the command should be called "????" > > We called it vhost since to all other hosts it behaved like a > host on a network. In our implementation each virtual host > had a set of interfaces and one routing table and you could > actually "route" packets between these hosts among other > things. You could even have for routing daemons etc. on each > one. WHo's "we" ? :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?476072F6.1080406>