Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:07:35 -0500
From:      Mike Andrews <mandrews@bit0.com>
To:        Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: aac tool regressions on 7.0-RC1
Message-ID:  <477D3277.5090707@bit0.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEE9077F-784B-42BB-8D88-A66F36012476@khera.org>
References:  <20080102034228.M16861@mindcrime.int.bit0.com>	<47A2B2D0-5C67-46A1-BD52-76667C68298F@khera.org>	<20080102174518.GA1755@sandvine.com> <AEE9077F-784B-42BB-8D88-A66F36012476@khera.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vivek Khera wrote:
> 
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
> 
>> I'm not aware of any reason to avoid Adaptec RAID cards specifically on
>> amd64 now; there were a number of problems in the past but they should
>> be addressed now.
>>
> 
> My main concern is that there is no *reliable* way to monitor the status 
> of an Adaptec RAID system on FreeBSD/amd64.

arcconf seems to be reliable (and a native amd64 binary), except for the 
aforementioned hanging-on-exit issue with -RC1.  On -BETA4 it's fine. 
Google for "check_icp" if you need a Nagios plugin written around 
arcconf (it needs only minor edits to work on /bin/sh instead of bash).

It's looking like aaccli is a lost cause though, yes.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?477D3277.5090707>