Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:05:25 +0200 From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> To: Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Benjamin Lutz <mail@maxlor.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Matus Harvan <mharvan@inf.ethz.ch> Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching Message-ID: <47821585.10804@moneybookers.com> In-Reply-To: <20071108224313.GA1927@dose.local.invalid> References: <472E9D0B.5080409@csub.edu> <20071106002940.GB1817@styx.ethz.ch> <472FD321.3010509@nortel.com> <20071108132222.GC1674@dose.local.invalid> <47334C71.1010102@nortel.com> <20071108224313.GA1927@dose.local.invalid>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, This problems is still not fixed in 7.0-RC1 Simon Barner wrote: >>> Please see kern/114722. The patch from the PR works fine with my >>> T61 (T7300). >>> >>> Funny enough, I contacted re@ to get this into 7.0 only two minutes ago. >>> >>> For the archives, the similar bug described in bin/117375 already seems >>> to be adressed in RELENG_7. >>> >> both pr's are open .. and >> >> releng_7 and head are both at v 1.26 of acpi_perf.c >> >> so, no it's not fixed, *anywhere*. :) >> > > It's true that both PRs are still open, but: > > 1) kern/114722 should fix your problem (CPUFREQ_CMP takes care of almost > identical frequencies). Have you already had a chance to verify that? > I can confirm that this patch solves the problem on my HP Compaq 8510w Can we have this fixed before RC2 ? > 2) bin/117375 talks about exactly identical frequencies, which should be > handled by acpi_perf.c (1.26, line 303-306). However, the reporter > (Cc'ed) of that PR runs FreeBSD 6.2-p8 which already contains the > removal of duplicate entries (MFC from acpi_perf.c 1.24). > > @Benjamin Lutz: Could you please check if the problem still exists, and > if so, whether the patch from kern/114722 fixes it? > > -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47821585.10804>