Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:28:24 +0100 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance Tracker project update Message-ID: <47986848.7010602@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <fn8lds$e63$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <4796C717.9000507@cederstrand.dk> <47972895.4050005@FreeBSD.org> <fn8lds$e63$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote: > > I have a suggestion to make the graphs more readable: if a long period > was chosen by the user (e.g. > 100 days / plot points), don't plot > points and error bars, plot a simple line through the points. Also, set > all date strings on the X-axis to empty strings except for the dates on > 1/10ths of the interval. Noted. Thanks. > Did you remove WITNESS,INVARIANTS and malloc debugging for the benchmarks? The kernel configuration file has: include GENERIC PERFMON nomakeoptions DEBUG PERFMON nooptions INVARIANTS PERFMON nooptions GDB PERFMON nooptions DDB PERFMON nooptions KDB PERFMON nooptions WITNESS PERFMON nooptions WITNESS_SKIPSPIN PERFMON nooptions INVARIANT_SUPPORT I also ship the images with a GENERIC kernel in case debugging is needed. I haven't touched malloc.conf but realize that I should. What's the official recommendation on malloc settings? Erik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47986848.7010602>