Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:14:50 -0800
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?QXJ0dXIgQmHEhw==?= <artur@ebasoft.com.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need info about ACPI - implementing, done ....
Message-ID:  <479F7B2A.2070900@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <200801280411.29358.artur@ebasoft.com.pl>
References:  <200801261837.26708.artur@ebasoft.com.pl>	<1201387323.7237.2.camel@localhost> <200801280411.29358.artur@ebasoft.com.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Artur Bać wrote:
> Saturday 26 of January 2008 23:42:03 Mikael Ikivesi napisał(a):
>> I really hope you can make it.
>  
> Idid it! after 3 days of diging acpi specifications , till i found
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/wmi/wmi-acpi.mspx

Congrats, glad to see people digging into acpi themselves.

> I'm so happy becouse this is my first at all kernel module/driver 
> in my life i have ever written.
> 
> very hot uncleaned code atached bellow.
> 
> Short abstract, tomorrow I will write more,
> There is no ACPI , there is Microsoft invention combo  of ACPI+WMI+MOF
> so we call acpi  method which calls wmi method with code located in bios or 
> embbeded as MOF data into acpi ...

Yeah, it would be better to implement a generic WMI driver and then call 
it from your wireless switch driver.  Not all laptops will support this 
method of calling into WMI via ACPI since it's not a standard.

-- 
Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479F7B2A.2070900>