Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 May 2008 12:30:35 -0700
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
To:        "'current@FreeBSD.org'" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Call for Testers: bsdcpio
Message-ID:  <483B0FDB.1060400@freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've just finished committing a new 'bsdcpio' implementation
of cpio to -CURRENT.  This has been in development for about
six months now and is ready for broader use.  Here are the
key details:

Starting now, there are two cpio programs in -CURRENT:
    /usr/bin/gcpio  - GNU cpio
    /usr/bin/bsdcpio - bsdcpio

In addition, there is a symlink:
    /usr/bin/cpio -> /usr/bin/gcpio (default)
    /usr/bin/cpio -> /usr/bin/bsdcpio (WITH_BSDCPIO)

In particular, WITH_BSDCPIO only controls the
symlink; bsdcpio is always built regardless.

Here's what I intend to do unless there are objections
or problems:

7.1:  I intend to MFC the arrangement described above;
   'bsdcpio' will be available, but 'cpio' will still
   alias 'gcpio' unless you specifically choose otherwise.

CURRENT:  In a few weeks, I intend to change the
   default so that 'cpio' points to 'bsdcpio' unless you
   build WITH_GCPIO.

8.x: Both 'bsdcpio' and 'gcpio' still available.  'cpio'
   defaults to 'bsdcpio' unless you build WITH_GCPIO.

9.x: Remove 'gcpio' (still available in ports!), 'cpio'
   always refers to 'bsdcpio'.

Please let me know your experiences with bsdcpio.

Cheers,

Tim Kientzle




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?483B0FDB.1060400>