Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:48:54 -0600 From: James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kinda headsup.. Message-ID: <484DA546.9060005@gritton.org> In-Reply-To: <484D8EDD.3040103@elischer.org> References: <484CC690.9020303@elischer.org> <20080609174826.Q83875@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <484D8EDD.3040103@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could we have a list of what isn't expected to actually commit? So the scheduler stuff is out. Is that all of the struct vcpu? Parts of struct vprocg? I see some scheduling bits in both. Aside from vnet/vinet and the doomed scheduling bits, I see not much besides the hostname, domain name, and morphing symlinks. Are these staying? The hostname is already in jails ,and the domainname makes sense in my new jail framework - the morphing symlinks might be something best left for later. Ideally, for integration purposes, the vnet/vinet would hang off jails that have pretty much the same capability as the vimage structure, and then other bits could be added later. I don't want to worry about trying to integrate features that aren't in the final cut anyway. - Jamie Julian Elischer wrote: > ... > > This diff there includes experimental changes to virtualise things > like load average, and they will not be part of the commit. > so ignore anything that smells like "scheduler"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?484DA546.9060005>