Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:27:17 +0100 From: Michiel Boland <michiel@boland.org> To: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: local ipv6 addresses do not appear in routing table Message-ID: <4958C225.8070907@boland.org> In-Reply-To: <49583F8F.2070406@boland.org> References: <037201c9693e$0c6ba24c$7202020a@internal.cacheflow.com> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A431442F3@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <49583F8F.2070406@boland.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michiel Boland wrote: > Li, Qing wrote: >> Hi Michiel, >> >> Please apply the patch http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/in6.c.diff >> and let me know how it works out for you. > > Appears to work, thanks. It appears I was cheering too soon. I have another setup that has the 2a01:3a8:130::1 address on gif0, rather than lo0, as in ifconfig gif0 inet6 2a01:3a8:130::1/64 but here the route to 2a01:3a8:130::1/128 via lo0 does not appear. If I create a default route that points to the gif0 interface, pings to 2a01:3a8:130::1 work, but they are passed through the tunnel. I also tried things like ifconfig gif0 inet6 2a01:3a8:130::1/128 2a01:3a8:130::2 with the same results. Cheers Michiel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4958C225.8070907>