Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:41:52 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) (was pr kern/105537) Message-ID: <49C9EE50.6070507@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <20090325140718.J95588@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <49C80E65.9090500@onetel.com> <49C93309.6050708@iki.fi> <20090325140718.J95588@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[Please would you cc me in any reply as I'm not subscribed, thanks.] Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Pasi Parviainen wrote: > > Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > Hi, I sent this a while ago but don't think there was a reply. I'm about to > > > embark on a custom ASL to load in loader.conf as per > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/acpi-debug.html but just > > > wondering if their might be a 'proper' fix on the way. I do have the latest > > > bios installed. > > > > Loading custom ASL with modified _CRT value for temperature zone in > > question will solve the problem, see below for more information. > > > > > Would it help if I installed 8-CURRENT? > > > > Probably not, see below. > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Subject: pr kern/105537 > > > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:00:49 +0000 > > > From: Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> > > > To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > Please would you cc me in any reply as I'm not subscribed, thanks. > > > > > > I have the same problem noted in > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/105537 > > > > > > of frequent messages saying > > > > > > acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) > > > > > > on my HP nc6320 laptop, model RH383ET. > > > > > > > I have HP 6510b and HP 2510p laptops and had same problem with those. > > Actual problem is that the ACPI thermal code in kernel does sanity-check > > for temperature values, and accepts only values between 0 - 200 Celsius. > > To solve the problem you either create custom DSDT which returns 200.0C > > value instead of 256.0C for thermal zone in question or increase the limit of > > the sanity-check code of ACPI thermal code (src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_thermal.c > > function: acpi_tz_sanity). > > > > Proper way to solve this in my opinion is to increase the range of > > sanity-check function from 0 - 200 Celsius to 0 - 256 Celsius, or at > > least provide sysctl variable to disable thermal sanity-checks. > > Even 200C is absurd, really. That's above the melting point of many > types of solder (http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/solder.htm) > while 256C exceeds the melting point of _most_ types of solder. I seem > to recall that this limit used to be 150C, still hotter than anything > you actually want to have anywhere on a computer board. > > No sense checking sanity to then accept insane values; fix the broken > ASL. 256 sounds suspiciously like a byte-swapped value, perhaps? > > cheers, Ian > Getting the ASL in the actual BIOS firmware fixed would be great, but I tried once to get Asus to correct a byte swapped value without success. I don't suppose HP will be any more cooperative but I can try. I will have a look at an acpidump tonight. A custom ASL would at least prove what is wrong. Does anyone know what this value is supposed to be measuring? Chrishelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49C9EE50.6070507>