Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:31:07 -0400 From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> To: michael <michael.copeland@gmail.com> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why?? (prog question) Message-ID: <49D27D8B.2070607@telenix.org> In-Reply-To: <49D24EC8.7030507@gmail.com> References: <20090331025726.GA10888@thought.org> <20090331112122.ae329221.freebsd@edvax.de> <49D202F0.9010104@utoronto.ca> <20090331140845.a1ece3c0.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903311623210.19609@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <49D24EC8.7030507@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
michael wrote:
Moved to FreeBSD-chat, all opinions really belong there.
>
>
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>> Tabbing is the worst form of indentation. It is *much* better to use
>>>> spaces consistently.
The only real sin is not sticking to one style per project. All else is just
folks being stubborn, and there is too much of that already in software, that
"my opinion is the only acceptable one" snobbery. Watch now while 10 different
folks jump up to start pounding their personal drums ...
>>>
>>
>> stupid discussion and off topic. everybody write code as he/she like,
>> or as a team decided if it's not single person work.
>>
>> only end result matters.
> you know real programmers code everything on one line.
> sub
> f{@s[$x,$y]=@s[($y+=$s[$x])%=@s,$x];$s[$x++]+$s[$y]-@s}@k=pop=~/../g;f$y+=hex$k[$x%@k]for@s=0..255;$x=1;$y=0;$/=\1;print$_^chr$s[f$x%=@s]for<>
Now that one, I like! Reminds me of that hoary old "Obfuscated C" competition.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknSfYsACgkQz62J6PPcoOmhyACfYMAzxOZcmDnfCGr8Xs5QJGYW
85QAoKAz0hH/cPVaqNVNjX75sSfFaPk4
=pdMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49D27D8B.2070607>