Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 13:16:29 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@freebsd.org>, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: C99: Suggestions for style(9) Message-ID: <49FCAA1D.1080208@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <49FCA148.9060707@gmx.de> References: <49F4070C.2000108@gmx.de> <20090502073658.GA65633@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <49FC752D.5080807@elischer.org> <49FC8574.5060205@gmx.de> <49FC8920.6050408@elischer.org> <49FC8E92.1090207@gmx.de> <49FC9A02.6080901@elischer.org> <49FCA148.9060707@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christoph Mallon wrote: > Julian Elischer schrieb: >> Christoph Mallon wrote: >>> Julian Elischer schrieb: >>>> Christoph Mallon wrote: >> >>> >>> So at the one hand you argue that hunting things is bad, but at the >>> same time you prefer it? I am confused. >> >> well, I won't hold your problems against you.. :-) > > It is sad that you are just toying around instead of answering a simple > question: > > Christoph Mallon wrote: >>> K&R code should be changed as part of related changes if possible. >>> A sweep to change a whole file is probably also ok. >>> changing them one at a time is probably not ok. >> >> But this is what actually is practiced. >> You still did not answer my question: Do you agree to remove the >> clause so no new old style declarations may be added? I think a new clause should be added specifying what should happen and replacing the old clause.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49FCAA1D.1080208>