Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 10:51:53 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Peter Cornelius <pcc@gmx.net> Cc: virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE Message-ID: <49FDD9B9.7090403@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20090503103244.44760@gmx.net> References: <20090413.220932.74699777.sthaug@nethelp.no> <49E57076.7040509@elischer.org> <20090424202923.235660@gmx.net> <200904242249.27640.zec@icir.org> <20090425133006.311010@gmx.net> <20090502131259.31160@gmx.net> <49FC78DA.2010201@elischer.org> <20090503103244.44760@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Cornelius wrote: > Re... > >> The situation is that right now jail and vimage are >> orthogonal (ish) however in the future, >> vimage will become a set of options on jail. > > Ah. SO it probably is kinda useless to try and stick a couple of jails 'inside' a vimage. no you will be able to nest jails. some of them may have the vimage options and some may not. > > Rgds., > > Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49FDD9B9.7090403>