Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:54:23 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Cezary Morga <cm@therek.net> Cc: perl@freebsd.org, QAT@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Custom LOCALBASE/PREFIX] net-mgmt/p5-SNMP - fails: makefile Message-ID: <4A5E17CF.20301@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4A5E03FE.2070104@therek.net> References: <20090626154720.157638FCB7@release.ixsystems.com> <4A565D3F.8020903@therek.net> <4A5D1A19.1040506@p6m7g8.com> <4A5D6982.2020308@therek.net> <4A5E03FE.2070104@therek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cezary Morga wrote: >> I'll prepare an update and fill a PR afterwards. Given that both come >> from the same source I expect it to build against net-snmp without a >> hitch. > > Given that net-snmp builds bundled Perl modules by default we have now > two options regarding net-mgmt/p5-SNMP: 1) disable Perl modules builds > in net-snmp and update p5-SNMP to 5.4.2.1 or 2) leave net-snmp as it is > and mark p5-SNMP DEPRECATED with comment 'p5-SNMP is built as a part of > net-mgmt/net-snmp now'. Personally, I'd opt for the latter. > > The current version of p5-SNMP (4.2.7.1) depends on net-snmp4 which is > deprecated with expiration date 2009-07-01 (two weeks ago) so IMO > there's no need to keep it around either. > > What do you think? > As the new maintainer of net-snmp with net-snmp55 in the pipeline, I like option #2. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net Senior Sys Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com ASF Member - Apache Software Foundation http://apache.org FreeBSD Committer - FreeBSD Foundation http://freebsd.org Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A5E17CF.20301>