Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:17:12 +0200 From: Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <4AB7A708.5080209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090921160955.GZ21946@elvis.mu.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <200909211237.n8LCbkxV017364@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <200909211309.n8LD9eTr017654@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20090921160955.GZ21946@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein skrev: > * Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> [090921 06:10] wrote: >> In article <20090921130346.GY21946@elvis.mu.org> you write: >> >>> I think he already explained that it's supposedly much better than >>> window(1) with a kinder license than screen(1). >>> >>> We really ought to ship with a screen(1)-like program. >> sudo pkg_add -r screen >> >> Problem solved. > > WORKS GREAT ESP WHEN NETWORK IS DOWN AND SOMEONE NEEDS MY HELP. > > WORKS AWESOME ON REALLY OLD MACHINES WHERE PACKAGES NO LONGER > EXIST. > > Note: Apple, which cares more about a usable userland unix than > we do at this time has screen installed in base as well. OpenBSD has tmux in base...and I've seen discussions on the NetBSD lists about importing tmux (as a window(1) replacement) into NetBSD base as well... :-) -- Joel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AB7A708.5080209>