Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:55:24 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How to confuse geom_part_mbr
Message-ID:  <4AFB953C.8030607@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <86d43omsb0.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <86tyx0mxjw.fsf@ds4.des.no>	<94D5F246-3413-4256-A0FB-6DF2D3BFE9D0@mac.com> <86d43omsb0.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> writes:
>>> The machine won't boot, even though you have a valid partition table
>>> on ad0 that points to a valid bsdlabel in ad0s1.
>> No, you don't have a valid partition table on ad0, because
>> you didn't remove the BSD disklabel in sector 2 on ad0.
> 
> Yes, I do have a valid partition table.  It is exactly byte-by-byte
> identical to the one I get after I zero sector two and re-run fdisk.
> The fact that there is unwanted data in sector 2 does *not* make it any
> less valid.
> 
> What's more, this could have easily been avoided if geom_whatever gave
> the partition table precedence over the label it found in sector 2.
> 
> DES

The dummy MBR on a disklabel can be relatively easily identified, and 
the regular MDR tasting code should note it and give it a lower 
priority than a real MBR. (and a disklabel)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AFB953C.8030607>