Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:59:24 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plans for Logged/Journaled UFS Message-ID: <4B2E65FC.9070609@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2E0FA9.1050003@fsn.hu> References: <20091030223225.GI5120@datapipe.com> <4AEB6D79.5070703@feral.com> <4B2E0FA9.1050003@fsn.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> >> Which use cases can you name? > Reliable data storage. :( Jeez, I wrote this months ago. Do you feel that improving UFS is a better way to go? I'm currently working at a place that still won't use UFS2. But this is just for /root, /var && /usr. Data storage for user data is another matter entirely, and unless you can hide UFS2/UFS3/... under a unified namespace, I don't think that this is the way to go.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2E65FC.9070609>