Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:28:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGphZG8gTcOkY2tl?= <tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net> To: Guillaume Seigneuret <gs@omegacube.fr> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host Message-ID: <4C1E2575.2070405@maecke.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTKwLrZaclBh70AnRBqwDRAQrUP4JuyYSiIqnF@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimMZKyYpG52Xf3pJsiJjYiBuoooOuJQdV8gjrv4@mail.gmail.com> <010101cb0fb1$e015e370$a041aa50$@fr> <AANLkTinqzrvXwUkbIXJISn2k-xhTqt3-q7omRXGU95p6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinTKwLrZaclBh70AnRBqwDRAQrUP4JuyYSiIqnF@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable than 4.0.0. Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268 tjado Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers > for the moment. > For information I did try : > > FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on : > > - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel > - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel > > FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on : > > - > - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel > - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne > > > Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM > partitions. > Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210. > > Cordialement, > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C1E2575.2070405>