Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:44:51 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, zfs-devel@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS arc_reclaim_needed: better cooperation with pagedaemon Message-ID: <4C72DDC3.1000006@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4C72DD1A.9070204@DataIX.net> References: <4C719AB9.9020006@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinreSt_Dk_J5vpZ6xrs=snqYu8zKfO0X6H-x_n3@mail.gmail.com> <4C721161.40403@freebsd.org> <AANLkTikg3e%2BGvZNtb5Uk3yAvWYwrgfF-4Rx0dDdooyQM@mail.gmail.com> <4C72DD1A.9070204@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/23/2010 16:42, jhell wrote: > On 08/23/2010 03:28, Artem Belevich wrote: >> Can anyone test the patch on a system with mix of UFS/ZFS filesystems >> and see if the change mitigates or solves the issue with inactive >> memory excessively backpressuring ARC. > > I have a system currently patched up to ZFSv15 and mm@'s metaslab patch > running that I can test this on. Throw me a patch and some specific > tests and I can have the results back to you in the next 2 days. > Forget the patch 1 line change I can hand type that in. As for specific tests, let me know... -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C72DDC3.1000006>