Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:31 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: rainer@ultra-secure.de Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1-RELEASE and cddl-sources from STABLE Message-ID: <4CCAD0AF.8080707@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <f3024e9897eb579ead47785ba08ac51e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> References: <ab57553ca5f4ad33ab091924d72be95b.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> <4CCAC9FF.5020207@icyb.net.ua> <f3024e9897eb579ead47785ba08ac51e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 29/10/2010 16:44 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following: >> on 29/10/2010 15:26 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following: >>> Does that actually make sense? >>> Or should we just upgrade to STABLE and live with the problems? >>> ;-) >> >> What problems? > > I don't know. > If all was good, we wouldn't have to wait until January for RELEASE, right? > ;-) Releases are produced based on time policy (e.g. every half a year), we are not waiting for anything in particular. > Seriously, though, we have a policy to only install a release if it's > called RELEASE. Even if you seriously mangle half a source tree by hand? - This is in regard to your original question. IMO, stable branch is the best release. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CCAD0AF.8080707>