Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:52:17 -0400 From: Jon Radel <jon@radel.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ATTN GARY KLINE Message-ID: <4CD24A11.9000604@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201011040210.oA42A7rb008179@mail.r-bonomi.com> <204E935E-240C-4418-A02B-8629B947854B@cwis.biz> <20101104062938.1b25880b.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020101010001050902020607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman<ryan.coleman@cwis.biz> = wrote: >> He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago >> and nothing's been fixed. > Seems to be fine from here: > > % nslookup -type=3Dany thought.org > Server: 192.168.100.1 > Address: 192.168.100.1#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > thought.org mail exchanger =3D 10 ethic.thought.org. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns2.everydns.net. > thought.org nameserver =3D ns1.thought.org. > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > > % host ethic.thought.org > ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns1.thought.org > ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210 > > % host ns2.everydns.net > ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100 > % ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net > PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.684 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.073 ms > 64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D54 time=3D107.046 ms > > --- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms > > Or am I misreading that? > > > You're overlooking the fact that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond to=20 queries about thought.org, though it is happy to respond to queries=20 about everydns.net. When half the servers for your zone refuse to=20 answer, things work less than 100%. On the other hand, I don't think=20 things are completely broken. Actually they're less broken than Gary's=20 DNS frequently is; it gets discussed on a regular basis for a reason. So is the last octet of ns1.thought.org's address 209 or 210? ;-) --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. --------------ms020101010001050902020607--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CD24A11.9000604>