Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:27:46 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: xcllnt@mac.com, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: G_PART macro definitions Message-ID: <4CF4EDC2.4030907@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4cf4d374.ej1zPKXBMjtfSPzw%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4cf21cd3.UbQ57eYkszW60Ww4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CF34297.4070300@yandex.ru> <4cf35138.VleaJCYj4z5kd9WX%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CF35809.6050704@yandex.ru> <4cf367ff.58BO71PlaI7w0e4r%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <F628AC1A-8C38-430F-BA43-7DABB76721DC@mac.com> <4cf4d374.ej1zPKXBMjtfSPzw%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30.11.2010 13:35, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > 4 ad0s2a is offered for tasting. Gpart.bsd doesn't like it because > it appears to contain a nested BSD label**. Gmirror finds its > metadata at the end of ad0s2a and instantiates gm0. BSD label is located at the beginning of the disk, so when ad0s2a is tasted it does detect your current (you call it as "outer") BSD label again. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CF4EDC2.4030907>