Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:23:25 -0300 From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com>, bz@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056 Message-ID: <4D6AB2BD.50208@gont.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <4D518FB3.3040503@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTi=rF%2BCYiNG7PurPtrwn-AMT9cYEe90epGAJDwDq@mail.gmail.com> <4D411CC6.1090202@gont.com.ar> <AANLkTinvg5tft8xockuuV9g5QYd36ko9qO4YCvy5bkJ1@mail.gmail.com> <4D431258.8040704@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTimhZ_pxTGt958AX8m=%2BS=g2hqsst=GH1a99D0g1@mail.gmail.com> <4D437B13.1070405@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTim4=xa0rfoLgt-ao30XoZkLZ1hMYzE6LsrLNcbM@mail.gmail.com> <4D518FB3.3040503@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/02/2011 03:47 p.m., Doug Barton wrote: [catching up with e-mail] > I've been up and running on this patch vs. r218391 for over 24 hours > now, using algorithm 4 (as someone said is now the default in Linux) > without any problems. > > I think Bjoern is better qualified than I to comment on the style of the > patch, but it applies cleanly, and seems to run fine on both v4 and v6. Has this been commited to the tree, already? -- If so, what's the default algorithm? Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D6AB2BD.50208>