Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:07:38 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Weird issue with hastd(8) Message-ID: <4DDD537A.7090408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DDD4964.7060008@sippysoft.com> References: <4DDD4890.70604@FreeBSD.org> <4DDD4964.7060008@sippysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25.5.2011 20:24, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > On 5/25/2011 11:21 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Hi Pawel, >> >> I am observing strange errors while synchronizing the data between >> primary and secondary. I keep getting the following error messages: >> >> May 25 11:09:19 eights hastd[10113]: [test] (secondary) Unable to >> receive request header: Socket is not connected. >> May 25 11:09:24 eights hastd[37571]: [test] (secondary) Worker process >> exited ungracefully (pid=10113, exitcode=75). >> May 25 11:10:17 eights hastd[12109]: [test] (secondary) Unable to >> receive request header: Socket is not connected. >> May 25 11:10:18 eights hastd[37571]: [test] (secondary) Worker process >> exited ungracefully (pid=12109, exitcode=75). >> May 25 11:10:39 eights hastd[14685]: [test] (secondary) Unable to >> receive request header: Socket is not connected. >> May 25 11:10:44 eights hastd[37571]: [test] (secondary) Worker process >> exited ungracefully (pid=14685, exitcode=75). I can only confirm this behavior. I have already reported this to Mikolaj and we are trying to hunt down the problem. I have started observing suddenly after some update. Unfortunately I haven't noted which revision I started to observe this bug ;( Do you happen to use some net.inet sysctls/tunables? >> >> The synchronization steel proceeds, but it's slow due to the need to >> re-negotiate and re-spawn the secondary worker. I have tried to ktrace >> both server and client at the same time. For some reason the primary >> keeps sending data, while client gets 0-read from the recvfrom at some >> point, while the primary keeps sending more data. This is 8-STABLE code >> on both ends. >> >> Any ideas of what could be wrong here are appreciated. > > Sorry, forgot the traces. > > Regards, > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- S pozdravom / Best regards Daniel Gerzo, FreeBSD committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DDD537A.7090408>