Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:20 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2 Message-ID: <4E2DE60C.8030902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org> References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky: > Hi! > > > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be > seen here: > > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/ > > > Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that > uncovered others that need fixing. The "Reason" column was extended and now > shows "assumes_gcc" which is the lowest hanging fruit :) > > A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. assumes_gcc reason) and prevent > a lot of other ports from building. > > It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports > you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into > the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang. > > Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other > ports from building). Greetings, there is one serious issue that spoilt (as discussed with kwm and rene on IRC) a major part of this -exp run. Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are newer clang-based 9-CURRENT systems without gcc. I hope we can have another -exp run soon that addresses this. Thanks. Best regards, Matthias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E2DE60C.8030902>