Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:20:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas Message-ID: <4E5BAE50.5030407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF-QHFXD28oowrYM1%2BLv8pPf3PT34uBJNA9cZeXSy30teTeVaw@mail.gmail.com> References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com> <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org> <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> <CAF-QHFXD28oowrYM1%2BLv8pPf3PT34uBJNA9cZeXSy30teTeVaw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 29/08/2011 18:18 Ivan Voras said the following: > On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >>> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>>> right? >>>> >>>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >>> >>> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >>> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >>> >>> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >>> before displaying the copyright banner). >> >> Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. >> Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. > > If it did, to what should I set it? See one line above your question :-) >> You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. > > I'll take some photos of the screen. No serial console? :( -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5BAE50.5030407>