Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:13:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/graphics Makefile ports/graphics/linux-tiff Makefile distinfo.i386 pkg-descr pkg-plist.i386 Message-ID: <4E9B8F5A.6050408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E9B144A.3050303@passap.ru> References: <201110150045.p9F0jStN040351@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E9B144A.3050303@passap.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 10/16/2011 10:28, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 15.10.2011 04:45, Doug Barton пишет: >> dougb 2011-10-15 00:45:28 UTC >> >> Log: >> Grant graphics/linux-tiff a stay of execution >> >> Due to the way that linux dependencies are recorded my greps for the >> portname, category/portname, etc. didn't discover that on RELENG_7 >> this version of the port is still heavily depended on. Neither did >> my building INDEX on more recent versions of FreeBSD. >> >> So bring it back for now, with the plan to mark those ports that >> depend on it BROKEN conditional on OSVERSION. > > Thanks for moving the port back. > > However can I ask everybody to consult with the maintainer before > touching a port? Thanks. Not only have I made my plans widely public, but I sent explicit mail to all maintainers detailing my plans on 2011-09-03, along with various followups. You can see yours at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-September/009121.html. Not that I blame you for my mistake, but I did rely to some extent on the extensive silence from the maintainers that did not respond as an implicit, "I don't see any problems with that plan." Doughome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9B8F5A.6050408>