Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:31:57 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Stop scheduler on panic Message-ID: <4EDBF4DD.3030001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndCBXXGG%2BihS_rVfM5TqcopHABg80U0my9PxguYY8QBD=Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111113083215.GV50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201112011349.50502.jhb@freebsd.org> <4ED7E6B0.30400@FreeBSD.org> <201112011553.34432.jhb@freebsd.org> <4ED7F4BC.3080206@FreeBSD.org> <4ED855E6.20207@FreeBSD.org> <4ED8A306.9020801@FreeBSD.org> <4ED8F1C1.7010206@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-FndCBXXGG%2BihS_rVfM5TqcopHABg80U0my9PxguYY8QBD=Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 02/12/2011 19:18 Attilio Rao said the following: > BTW, I'm waiting for the details to settle (including the patch we > have been discussing internally about binding to CPU0 during ACPI > shutdown) I do not see strong interdependency between that patch and the panic patch. BTW, I think that your patch is good to go. > before to read the whole thread and start a proper review, > would it be possible to have an almost-final version of the patch? It is still the same patch that Kostik posted a few weeks ago. I think that it is long overdue to be committed. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDBF4DD.3030001>