Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:25:37 -0700 From: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 Message-ID: <4F5D5091.6050807@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmondMGQzw91UyDx3-3%2BmqLOXLMncn-pvUR6NQm-YwhPsgg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BCYCL-d1hCzQK48EzPjgRu3UFO9EWMn-O%2B3V8%2B9cNrQE2s%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F41DDE8.6060004@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonaRy0HyaoborYg=CEbAwKGHXZooi8k5qC8781Pe7591A@mail.gmail.com> <4F48166A.5040301@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomQiwjH-nDmWJA=pg-gcgV9Djf0eCM940UvaXW_g030XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL-6=03MvCCKq4z5aePqLPWzjAQZmHAKDXwNA8f5Gawu7A@mail.gmail.com> <4F4828C0.6020705@gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL_o=mDA-P66nTdPR65=MwML4FghxRpNzowDE-eXNWmD6g@mail.gmail.com> <4F5A8023.1090705@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonu4SUVOdfbTdAnmGfQ=T-PtcAbd-PCoQ0PV_ttwF5Scw@mail.gmail.com> <4F5AC7CF.3090409@gmail.com> <4F5C0C86.7040503@gmail.com> <4F5C24ED.3090601@gmail.com> <4F5CD920.2000905@gmail.com> <4F5D0876.5040409@gmail.com> <4F5D14E0.3050301@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=jJmwY=bTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pSWcBg@mail.gmail.com> <20120312001625.4d9b3b52.ray@ddteam.net> <CAJ-VmondMGQzw91UyDx3-3%2BmqLOXLMncn-pvUR6NQm-YwhPsgg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 03/11/12 17:26, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hiya, > > Remember how I said that you should submit things to commit to freebsd? :-) > > Let's not leave it living in the zrouter tree; let's get it into FreeBSD-HEAD. > > So please, do up a diff against -HEAD of your ralink driver changes > and lets get _something_ ASAP into the tree. > > Sheesh.. :-) > > > adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you have a better one Aleksandr let's do it...I unearthed my old diff because there was still no support. Fundamentally, I agree with keeping things similar to OpenBSD. If the work is already done we should do that. In the mean time, if we don't have such a thing, we have something this way...I'm really just learning wireless kernel dev. I don't really have an "attachment" to this particular version, other than it worked for me and if it helped others :) I do feel that perhaps being synchronized with the current OpenBSD makes sense, but that it will be a while before I personally can figure out all the steps in porting their current code. Most is similar, but there are significant differences. Thanks! Matthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5D5091.6050807>