Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:36:12 +0200 From: Alfred Bartsch <bartsch@dssgmbh.de> To: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: how does "javavms" work? Message-ID: <4FAD07BC.2090808@dssgmbh.de> In-Reply-To: <B10943F5-3648-4993-B5C4-A0C96CFF604B@shire.net> References: <B10943F5-3648-4993-B5C4-A0C96CFF604B@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 27.04.2012 20:53, schrieb Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC: > Hi > > Not the behind the scenes really. Just how do I use it? > > I installed OpenJDK7 from ports. As part of that it installed the > Diablo stuff (Java 6). > > the /usr/local/etc/javavms file listed both. But when I edited > this file to only have the OKDK 7 version, it still runs the Diable > JDK 6 stuff when I type "java" at the command line. > > I read the man file on javavms and used registervm and unregistervm > and javavms only lists the OpenJDK 7 version but if I do > > # java -version java version "1.6.0_07" Diablo Java(TM) SE Runtime > Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b02) Diablo Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit > Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixed mode) # > Normally, the Diablo stuff is installed as a build dependency to compile the openjdk stuff, and can safely be removed afterwards. But you may keep both JVMS, or you may install even some more. In these cases javavmwrapper kicks in and lets you choose your preferred JVM. Unfortunately, javavmwrapper behaves differently, whether it sees an installed portstree (/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk) or not. It is my experience that the wanted priority of JVMs due to /usr/local/etc/javavms is only guaranteed, if there is no portstree available. So I decided to patch the javavm wrapper skript (/usr/local/bin/javavm) to remove these unwanted features. Now everything works for me as expected. The attached patch file applies to an installed javavmwrapper-2.3.5 port. You may alternatively just remove those lines from the script file. HTH P.S.: I'm thinking of filing a PR, since it looks like a bug. - -- Alfred Bartsch Data-Service GmbH mailto:bartsch@dssgmbh.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+tB7wACgkQ5QGe2JdVf3g4MwCeO+POVkgOVEYs6yrD4DedfwD3 XacAoLpEI04nrdZq3/iQVFK3QUry/doy =sOgr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- [-- Attachment #2 --] --- javavm.orig 2011-09-30 04:40:51.000000000 +0200 +++ javavm 2012-05-11 09:07:53.000000000 +0200 @@ -493,30 +493,6 @@ unset JAVA_HOME - # Determine location of bsd.port.mk if it exists - _JAVAVM_PORTSDIR= - if [ -r /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk ]; then - _JAVAVM_PORTSDIR=`"${_JAVAVM_MAKE}" -f /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk -V PORTSDIR 2>/dev/null` - fi - - _JAVAVM_BSD_PORT_MK= - if [ -n "${_JAVAVM_PORTSDIR}" -a -r "${_JAVAVM_PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk" ]; then - _JAVAVM_BSD_PORT_MK="${_JAVAVM_PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk" - fi - - # If bsd.port.mk was found, use that to determine the VM to use. - if [ -n "${_JAVAVM_BSD_PORT_MK}" ]; then - JAVA_HOME=`"${_JAVAVM_MAKE}" -f "${_JAVAVM_BSD_PORT_MK}" -V JAVA_HOME USE_JAVA=yes 2>/dev/null` - if [ -n "${JAVA_HOME}" -a -f "${JAVA_HOME}/bin/${_JAVAVM_PROG}" ]; then - _JAVAVM_PROG_PATH="${JAVA_HOME}/bin" - return 0 - elif [ -n "${JAVA_HOME}" -a \ - -f "${JAVA_HOME}/jre/bin/${_JAVAVM_PROG}" ]; then - _JAVAVM_PROG_PATH="${JAVA_HOME}/jre/bin" - return 0 - fi - fi - # Then try to make sure that ${_JAVAVM_CONF} exists if [ ! -e "${_JAVAVM_CONF}" ]; then echo "${_JAVAVM_PROG}: error: can't find ${_JAVAVM_CONF} configuration file" 1>&2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FAD07BC.2090808>