Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:45:35 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 prognostication... Message-ID: <4FAE859F.5010108@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <CADT2zBv651OzWK_t%2B17tKvzD5BRkwuvYqfz8HCr5=uiXyydMEw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADT2zBt=EpJvRRuXwVfobusnWr=DnS%2BCg4%2BFqe=ExzEvteHnOg@mail.gmail.com> <4FA2434F.1020802@unsane.co.uk> <864nrxh5zf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CADT2zBv651OzWK_t%2B17tKvzD5BRkwuvYqfz8HCr5=uiXyydMEw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/12/2012 6:25 AM, Vance Siemens wrote: > Can you share a brief overview of what's wrong with it? I guess I'm > not as knowledgeable as I thought. The story was quite enticing to me. > Very few of the historical facts are actually correct.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FAE859F.5010108>