Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:30:36 -0300 From: H <hm@hm.net.br> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP Message-ID: <4FDE3E6C.9080703@hm.net.br> In-Reply-To: <201206172152.55303.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <201206151819.32398.hselasky@c2i.net> <4FDB6AA3.3040606@gmail.com> <201206172152.55303.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelovin@gmail.com wrote: >> Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier >> to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP >> was the basic unit in Internet based networking but feel free to correct >> me if you have any news I might have missed... :) >> >> Also do you have any idea why AMD based CPUs could be vulnerable to this >> alternative networking scheme and cause a remote denial service in fbsd >> stable but not in CURRENT? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Etienne > > Hi, > > I loose packets because I use a WLAN adapter. Sometimes the link is down for > various reasons, and then the routes start changing for manually created > routes, and I want to prevent that. > well that is certainly not a reason for changing routes I have the feeling you are not explaining good enough what really is going on and it may help sending your configurations and an example of routes and IP addresses before and after this route change Hans -- H +55 11 4249.2222 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/ePnEACgkQvKVfg5xjCDzP8ACeKmoHqKnTNZZWaXeyC5owygBG jtEAnRhO4rysP2Ob0MqdDnG4ib4kjbtt =2MpI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FDE3E6C.9080703>