Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:36:56 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra> References: <201206201015.q5KAFKKj026496@mail.r-bonomi.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201353500.24316@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Perrin wrote:
> Someone in this extended discussion mentioned that there are efforts
> underway to make sure the base system will compile cleanly with both
> Clang and GCC 4.2+, so I think you're just making up complaints here.
> Someone (other than Wojciech Puchar, who would just be talking out of his
> ass) correct me if I'm mistaken.
That was me. I don't have pure facts but I read svn logs daily. Today we
have a bunch of:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r237428 | eadler | 2012-06-22 08:48:53 +0300 (пт, 22 чер 2012) | 5 lines
MFC r237253:
Remove variables which are initialized but never used
thereafter reported by gcc46 warning
Approved by: cperciva (implicit)
So at least there are some people working on polishing CURRENT/STABLE up
to the point it will build with gcc46.
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE41288.5020404>