Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:24:24 -0700 From: Edward M <eam1edward@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <4FE65028.9050809@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE64F04.2090100@gmail.com> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <4FE64F04.2090100@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/23/2012 04:19 PM, Edward M wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 12:33 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
>> Now, I want to the same thing on 8.3 and wanted to know
>> your opinion on ZFS stability. Is there any success story using
>> ZFS in 24x7, large volume, heavy duty servers? Is there any
>> other option other than ZFS to build larger than 2TB file systems?
>
>
> I like the ZFS theroy, However I would have to question ZFS Pool
> Version Number 28 stability,
> that is what freebsd 9.0 comes with. because it was never really
> used/marked as production ready by sun/oracle.
> in my opionion version 28 is consider as a development version.
> solaris 11 uses version 33 so that is consider
> as production ready but it is closed source. i think the last open
> zfs version pool marked as production ready,was pool
> version 14 and 15
> zfs sounds great however i would actally trust more UFS2 for 24x7
> servers.
>
> agian this is my opinion, could be wrong:-)
>
>
snafu on my part freebsd 8.3 also uses zfs pool version 28:-)
so my opinion would also be the same.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE65028.9050809>