Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:59:03 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Sayetsky Anton <vsjcfm@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: Message-ID: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <CAFG2KC%2BsKDWDx1gK3r9gedT7ukmZ97EfE%2BW5zv9hO2XhGgWN7A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFG2KC%2BsKDWDx1gK3r9gedT7ukmZ97EfE%2BW5zv9hO2XhGgWN7A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activated. Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on the "old" version? I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF2B457.9030505>