Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:47:27 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD start slices at head boundaries? Message-ID: <4FF724AF.9090602@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: <20471.8240.321332.987229@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <CAHzLAVE0CahZhkKzU5=bLy5AvKsq_qgmqwAiO9BhWD3k1_uFvQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207061842370.5024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FF71637.9030206@d3photography.com> <20471.8240.321332.987229@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/06/2012 07:28 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > Ryan Coleman writes: > >> > Anyway just don't make slices at all if your disk is dedicated >> > to FreeBSD >> >> Except for swap, right? > Why do you say that? > > > Robert huff > > > I think Ryan means partition and not slice? I would not recommend no slices at all, It's deprecated to use "dangerously dedicated disks" Starting with 9 I don't see slices in mount ouput anymore but still there are FreeBSD partitions in slices (which is a partitions in dos terms) Example / is now disk0p1 it used to be disk0s1a Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF724AF.9090602>