Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:18:39 +0300 From: Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing CVS from HEAD Message-ID: <5053209F.4090803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86y5kd3sf1.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <CAF6rxgnZGjzm230sZXVXxmE7wPowF_BZqbwRjdvz8oV-03gS=A@mail.gmail.com> <505187E4.6060404@gmail.com> <86ehm65guf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <5051DB64.4050504@gmail.com> <86y5kd3sf1.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14.09.2012 11:44, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Markiyan Kushnir<markiyan.kushnir@gmail.com> writes: >> I think I can replace csup with freebsd-update/portsnap pair for >> upgrading the src and ports trees only, and still be able to build >> everything from sources. > > You'd be better off using svn for your source tree. > > DES Well, yes. I see that I will have to use svn for source updates. Even if = I could update the src and ports trees via freebsd-update/portsnap, I=20 couldn't use it to track the sources between releases, or to track the HE= AD. I just wanted to see if I can retain the convenience of the system being = able to update its sources without the help of any ports app (which the=20 svn is). If it's not possible, I will "factor out" the source update=20 outside my upgrade scenario. -- Markiyan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5053209F.4090803>