Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:47:39 -0700 From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watchdogd coredump Message-ID: <50959F0B.7010505@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20121103233426.0000371d@unknown> References: <20121103225542.00001118@unknown> <20121103220843.GI73505@kib.kiev.ua> <20121103233426.0000371d@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/3/12 3:34 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 00:08:43 +0200 Konstantin Belousov > <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are you sure that your kernel is at r242511 ? >> >> The issue should have been fixed by r242011. > > # svnversion 242511M > > # svn status M contrib/bind9/bin/named/interfacemgr.c M > etc/defaults/rc.conf M etc/rc.d/jail M > sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c M sys/dev/drm/drmP.h M > sys/dev/usb/serial/ulpt.c M sys/kern/kern_jail.c M > sys/sys/jail.h M sys/sys/priv.h M sys/vm/uma_core.c > > The uma_core patch is the one floating around which shall prevent > memory fragmentation, the others are mostly my X-in-jail and some > minor default values (ata, ulpt) changes. > > Currently I'm back to the previous kernel+world, but I still have > the r242511M boot environment available (I have no time to > investigate the problem this evening, and I want to have a stable > system until I get time to have a deeper look at this). What was 'strings /boot/kernel.bad/kernel | tail' saying? Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQlZ8LAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuz2S8IAKfvH1m7L3TQay3tghddaI1k ohMic676FX/u24lxFpO9ENPxZq28VKyTIKG+5XD2dxfYvX9kRRmfRUVQHHc5Ri2H c/ZPusPFkOCS3/U74puHvgIF+ypi7110AOC4S+T6whW9D8SVLL/Hauu05CbbjYb1 ef5Vhj0xnxa+XlWhDY6h4QPeduvzulrxhcjJiyiS5aH+ZBMph26cBUfxyrzfMV+2 akJbI0KV0z0AR5HgwS16CLVahApqEuRyXWNmwEuE2c234q0clXarsJS7biDy0X2P eeFogNkoOJzVbLVOmKtgG1l63yEfAKtDTJURtaOTB7/COG4KkeWolj3elL60MVw= =a1YO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50959F0B.7010505>