Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:19:59 +0100
From:      Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
To:        mexas@bristol.ac.uk
Cc:        toolchain@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] devel/binutils 2.23
Message-ID:  <50A3FCEF.9060204@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/14/12 15:45, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current.
> I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are
> simple tests.
>
> Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files
> from under files/ after applying the patch:
>
> # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/
> total 20
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  1024 Nov 14 12:58 .
> drwxr-xr-x  4 root  wheel   512 Nov 14 13:00 ..
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc
> #
>
> because I think all files in this directory
> will be used as patches, no matter the name.
> Am I wrong?
>
> Anton

Just compile test some binaries and see that they link and work ok.
The .orig files are left over when running patch, and has to be removed. 
  Sorry if I wasn't clear on that in my previous mail.
Thanks for testing!
Regards!
-- 
Niclas Zeising



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A3FCEF.9060204>