Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:19:46 +0100 From: Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] devel/binutils 2.23 Message-ID: <50A4A5A2.2000902@beastielabs.net> In-Reply-To: <50A3FCEF.9060204@freebsd.org> References: <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <50A3FCEF.9060204@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/14/12 21:19, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 11/14/12 15:45, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current. >> I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are >> simple tests. >> >> Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files >> from under files/ after applying the patch: >> >> # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/ >> total 20 >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 . >> drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 .. >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc >> # >> >> because I think all files in this directory >> will be used as patches, no matter the name. >> Am I wrong? >> >> Anton > > Just compile test some binaries and see that they link and work ok. > The .orig files are left over when running patch, and has to be removed. > Sorry if I wasn't clear on that in my previous mail. > Thanks for testing! > Regards! Please be aware that apparently something went wrong with the release of binutils-2.23 (see the discussion ending in: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00339.html though I doubt the glitches will affect your usage) and it has been re-released as binutils-2.23.1. Maybe it is better to base the update if the binutils port on that release. Kind regards, Hans Ottevanger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A4A5A2.2000902>