Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:49:13 +0000 From: John Bayly <john.bayly@tipstrade.net> To: FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Clarrification on whether portsnap was affected by the 2012 compromise Message-ID: <50AB6029.4090608@tipstrade.net>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Regarding the 2012 compromise, I'm a little confused as to what was and wasn't affected: >From the release: > or of any ports compiled from trees obtained via any means other than > through svn.freebsd.org or one of its mirrors Does that mean that any ports updated using the standard "portsnap fetch" may have been affected, I'm guessing yes. Many thanks, Johnhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AB6029.4090608>
